Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld14 October 20253368741

Land West of Parsons Field Stables, Pickhurst Lane, Pulborough, West Sussex, RH20 1DA

Authority
Horsham District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
King T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The appeal on ground (b): whether the breach alleged has occurred as a matter of fact, in particular whether the access previously existed
  • The appeal on ground (f): whether the requirements of the notice exceed what is reasonably necessary to remedy the breach or any injury to amenity
  • The appeal on ground (g): whether the periods specified in the notice fall short of what should reasonably be allowed

What decided it

The appellants failed to provide compelling evidence to rebut the Council's case that the access had been newly created, and established case law confirmed the notice could lawfully require removal of facilitative works and closure of the access.

The disruption to the children's education and family circumstances was given some significant weight but did not outweigh the need for the phased compliance timetable requiring cessation of the use and remedial works within the specified periods.

Judgments cited: Murfitt v SSE & East Cambridgeshire DC [1980] JPL 598; Somak Travel v SSE & Brent LBC [1987] JPL 630; Stevens v SSCLG [2013] EWHC 792 (Admin); Collins v SSCLG [2013] EWCA Civ 1193

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.