Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld23 October 20253369052

Plot 1, West of Water Lane, Harrietsham, Kent, ME17 1DH

without planning permission, the material change of use of land to a mixed use of keeping of horses and residential for Gypsies and Travellers including the stationing of caravans and associated operational works including the laying of hard surfacing, installation of a septic tank, erection of close boarded timber fencing and the erection of three stable buildings, two which are used as utility buildings

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Hartley D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the loss of ancient woodland and protected trees
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the site is accessible to local services by means of sustainable modes of transport
  • If planning harm is identified, whether any such harm is outweighed by other considerations sufficient to justify granting planning permission

What decided it

The loss of ancient woodland as an irreplaceable habitat without wholly exceptional reasons and without a suitable compensation strategy, combined with significant harm to character and appearance and failure to meet accessibility requirements, outweighed the material considerations in favour of the development.

Framework references: 11, 28, 187, 193

Plan policies cited: LPRHOU8, LPRHOU8(1)(b), LPRHOU8(1)(c), LPRHOU8(1)(f), LPRSP9, LPRSP14(A), LPRSP15

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.