Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision19 December 20253369299

Tudor Lodge, Ringshall Drive, Little Gaddesden, Hertfordshire, HP4 1NU

Planning appeal 3369299 at Tudor Lodge, Ringshall Drive, Little Gaddesden, Hertfordshire, HP4 1NU (Dacorum Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 19 December 2025 by Inspector Bowden N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the locality having particular regard to the site's location in the Rural Area, within the Chilterns National Landscape and within the setting of heritage assets.

the erection of a single storey garden room and a two bay car port with side store in the curtilage of a listed building

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Bowden N
Postcode
HP4 1NU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the locality having particular regard to the site's location in the Rural Area, within the Chilterns National Landscape and within the setting of heritage assets

What decided it

The car port's prominent position at the front of the property in a sensitive fringe location between the village and undeveloped wooded areas, combined with its harmful effect on the setting of listed buildings and conservation area, outweighed any public benefits, whereas the garden room's discrete siting and small scale rendered it acceptable.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS7CS24CS11CS12CS27Policy 119Policy 120
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 189Paragraph 212Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dacorum

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266003892
    Bulbourne Wood, New Road, Northchurch, Berkhamsted, HP4 1LN
  2. Invalid20 October 20266011032
    Greymantle, Hempstead Road, Bovingdon, HP3 0HF
  3. Invalid16 October 20266011849
    Greymantle, Hempstead Road, Bovingdon, HP3 0HF
  4. Allowed15 October 20266012966
    126 Bennetts End Road, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8DZ
  5. Allowed14 October 20266006896
    Apsley Depot, Ebberns Road, Apsley, HP3 9RE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.