Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 November 20253369302

1 & 2 Honey Pot Cottages, Joss Lane, SEDBERGH, LA10 5AS

‘The planning permission granted for S/03/653 does not include an external garden area. I would like to include the area as defined in this application not only to afford external space to the premises but also because this area could not be used for agricu ltural use given its location to the property and the road/path between the land and the remainder of the agricultural land. At the moment members of the public are able to access the area from the public footpath and this gives issues of security and privacy that I would like to mitigate’

Authority
Yorkshire Dales
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Duff N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the site's location within the Yorkshire Dales National Park and including any effect on the significance of non-designated heritage assets
  • Whether the proposed development would meet the statutory requirements for the provision of biodiversity net gain

What decided it

The proposed development would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the Yorkshire Dales National Park and the agrarian character of a non-designated heritage asset, conflicting with the statutory duty to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the National Park and with adopted development plan policies SP1, SP2, SP4 and L1.

Framework references: 189, 216

Plan policies cited: SP1, SP2, SP4, L1, W1, W2, CC1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.