Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 February 20263369518

Bickerstaffe Service Station, Rainford Road, Bickerstaffe, L39 0HF

an extension to the existing sales building and associated works

Authority
West Lancashire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Lancaster K
Postcode
L39 0HF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policies and the provisions of the Framework
  • If the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal fails to demonstrate a demonstrable unmet need for the retail expansion component, and the limited to moderate weight afforded to the various benefits does not clearly outweigh the substantial weight attributed to harm to Green Belt openness and purposes.

Framework references: 104, 110, 115, 143, 148, 154, 155, 156, 157

Plan policies cited: Policy GN1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.