Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 January 20263369537

62 Lower Addiscombe Road, CROYDON, CR0 6AB

the use of basement for purposes within class E (ancillary to existing consent 16/01677/GPDO)

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Bayliss G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not there is sufficient justification for the change of use of the public house to a Class E use, and its effect on the vitality and viability of established town centres
  • Whether or not the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses, and whether any harm would be caused to its significance
  • Whether or not the proposal would make adequate provision for cycle parking
  • Whether or not the proposal would make adequate provision for protected species
  • Whether or not the development would achieve the highest standards of fire safety

What decided it

The proposal would cause harm to the significance of the Grade II listed building that could not be outweighed by the limited public benefits, combined with inadequate justification for the loss of the public house use and failure to comply with sequential test and cycle parking requirements.

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy HC7, London Plan Policy E1, London Plan Policy T5, London Plan Policy G6, London Plan Policy D12, London Plan Policy HC1, Croydon Local Plan Policy DM21, Croydon Local Plan Policy DM8, Croydon Local Plan Policy DM5.2, Croydon Local Plan Policy SP4, Croydon Local Plan Policy DM10, Croydon Local Plan Policy DM18, Croydon Local Plan Policy DM27, Croydon Local Plan Policy SP7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.