Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 November 20253369711

10 Westfield Crescent, THATCHAM, RG18 3EH

the sub-division of the plot to form a new self-build dwelling, together with extensions and alterations to the existing dwelling

Authority
West Berkshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cuthbert L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the existing occupants of 12 Westfield Crescent, in particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area through disruption of the established architectural symmetry of the semi-detached pair and the material harm to the outlook of neighbouring occupants outweighed the modest housing and economic benefits.

the modest housing benefits and economic benefits did not outweigh the identified harm to character and appearance and the living conditions of neighbouring occupants

Framework references: 11, 135, 12

Plan policies cited: Policy SP7, Policy DM28, Policy DM30

Judgments cited: Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & Others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314; Gambone v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] EWHC 952 (Admin); Burge v SSE [1988] JPL 487

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.