Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 November 20253369711

10 Westfield Crescent, Thatcham, RG18 3EH

Planning appeal 3369711 at 10 Westfield Crescent, Thatcham, RG18 3EH (West Berkshire District Council) was dismissed on 5 November 2025 by Inspector Cuthbert L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the sub-division of the plot to form a new self-build dwelling, together with extensions and alterations to the existing dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cuthbert L
Postcode
RG18 3EH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the existing occupants of 12 Westfield Crescent, in particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area through disruption of the established architectural symmetry of the semi-detached pair and the material harm to the outlook of neighbouring occupants outweighed the modest housing and economic benefits.

the modest housing benefits and economic benefits did not outweigh the identified harm to character and appearance and the living conditions of neighbouring occupants

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP7Policy DM28Policy DM30
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 12
Judgments
Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & Others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314; Gambone v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] EWHC 952 (Admin); Burge v SSE [1988] JPL 487

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

58 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in West Berkshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed2 July 20266006551
    Sawpit House, Long Lane, Cold Ash, Thatcham, RG18 9LU
  2. Dismissed2 July 20266006548
    Sawpit House, Long Lane, Cold Ash, Thatcham, RG18 9LU
  3. Dismissed12 June 20266004050
    Land Off Beechfield Lane, Frilsham, Thatcham, RG18 9XD
  4. Allowed23 February 20263376040
    75 Fifth Road, The Oaks, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 6DT
  5. Dismissed26 September 20253367580
    Rosewood Longmoor Lane, Mortimer Common, Reading, RG7 3RP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.