Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed21 November 20253369718

463 High Road , Leytonstone, London, County, E11 4JU

Planning appeal 3369718 at 463 High Road , Leytonstone, London, County, E11 4JU (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was allowed on 21 November 2025 by Inspector Heppell J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of approving the submitted details on the appearance of the development and on local amenity and biodiversity.

the demolition of the existing building and the construction of a three storey building with a basement to provide retail space (use class B1, B2 and D1) at basement and ground floor and five self-contained flats on the upper floors (3 x 1 bed, 2 x 2 bed) without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 209294, dated 8 December 2021

Authority
Waltham Forest London Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Heppell J
Postcode
E11 4JU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of approving the submitted details on the appearance of the development and on local amenity and biodiversity

What decided it

The technical difficulties with the original green roof design, which the Council did not dispute, justified the revised proposals as maximising biodiversity potential and providing appropriate local amenity within the constraints of a fully built site.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS15DM23DM32DM35Policy 53Policy 77Policy 79

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

566 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed22 October 20266011485
    Land Adjoining 120 Warner Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 7DZ
  2. Allowed20 October 20266013085
    53 Badlis Road, London, E17 5LG
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266012954
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266012953
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.