Planning appeal decision
Land at Sharps Farm, South of The Street, Latchingdon, CM3 6JP
Planning appeal 3369961 at Land at Sharps Farm, South of The Street, Latchingdon, CM3 6JP (Maldon District Council) was dismissed on 21 January 2026 by Inspector Bowyer J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to relevant development plan policies providing the Council's spatial strategy.
‘outline planning application with all matters reserved except for means of access, for up to 140 no. dwellings (Use Class C3) including 40% affordable housing; new site access and internal access roads; a new village centre (Use Class E(a)); flexible employment space (Use Class E); car and cycle parking; landscaping; sustainable urban drainage systems; public open space and footpaths; community woodlands and allotments; together with associated infrastructure’
- Authority
- Maldon District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Bowyer J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to relevant development plan policies providing the Council's spatial strategy
- the effect of the proposal on the integrity of designated European and Ramsar sites
- the effect of the proposal on the character, appearance and identity of Latchingdon and surrounding countryside
- whether or not the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to flood risk
- whether or not the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to future occupiers' access to services, facilities and sustainable transport modes
- the effect of the proposal on the demand for and provision of local infrastructure with particular regard to foul drainage, education; healthcare - GP services; and highways
What decided it
The Inspector could not be satisfied, applying the precautionary principle under the Habitats Regulations, that the proposal would not adversely affect the integrity of the Essex Coast European and Ramsar sites via functionally linked land for wintering/foraging birds.
The benefits of the scheme, including significant weight afforded to housing and affordable housing delivery, were found insufficient to outweigh the unresolved harm to the integrity of European and Ramsar sites together with other identified harms, resulting in conflict with the development plan as a whole that was not outweighed by material considerations including the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S2Policy S8Policy D1Policy D5Policy N2Policy H1Policy I1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 175Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maldon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed14 October 20266009639Land Adjacent Howells Farm Cottages, Maypole Road, Great Totham, CM9 4SY
- Allowed18 August 20266005664Land West of Spratts Farm, Queenborough Road, Southminster, CM0 7AD
- Allowed6 July 20266004910Land West of the Cemetery, London Road,, Maldon, CM9 6LJ
- Dismissed3 June 20266005039Land Adjacent 37 Sawyers Road, Tolleshunt Major, Maldon, CM9 8JW
- Allowed30 April 20266002783Land North East Of Woodham Mortimer Lodge, Lodge Road, Woodham Mortimer, Essex, CM9 6SJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®