Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed5 December 20253370101

41 Chiphouse Road, Kingswood, Bristol, BS15 4TR

Planning appeal 3370101 at 41 Chiphouse Road, Kingswood, Bristol, BS15 4TR (South Gloucestershire Council) was allowed on 5 December 2025 by Inspector Barton P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the disputed condition is reasonable or necessary in the interests of the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of occupiers of No. 43a Chiphouse Road, with particular reference to privacy.

erection of a two storey side extension and a single storey rear extension to provide additional living accommodation. Erection of front porch and relocation of rear outbuilding without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref P24/02588/HH, dated 7 February 2025

Authority
South Gloucestershire Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Barton P
Postcode
BS15 4TR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the disputed condition is reasonable or necessary in the interests of the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of occupiers of No. 43a Chiphouse Road, with particular reference to privacy

What decided it

The absence of clear justification and compelling evidence that removal of permitted development rights was necessary to protect the character and appearance of the area or the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy PSP8Policy PSP38Policy PSP43Policy PSP16
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 55

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

106 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012302
    61 Durban Road, Bristol, BS34 5HG
  2. Allowed16 October 20266014921
    Land At 39 Bude Road, Filton, BS34 7HW
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266011871
    49 Court Road, Kingswood, Bristol, BS15 9QG
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266010963
    Elmbarn Farm, Westerleigh Road, Westerleigh, BS37 8QF
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266009931
    Land at Wapley Road, Codrington, Bristol, BS37 6RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.