Planning appeal decision
Land Off the B480, Chalgrove, OX49 5BA
Planning appeal 3370273 at Land Off the B480, Chalgrove, OX49 5BA (South Oxfordshire District Council) was allowed on 20 February 2026 by Inspector Dawe A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development in terms of the Council's spatial strategy; and access to local services, facilities and public transport.
Outline planning application for the erection of up to 160 dwellings including affordable housing, with public open space, landscaping, sustainable drainage system (SuDS) and vehicular access. All matters reserved except for means of access
- Authority
- South Oxfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Dawe A
- Postcode
- OX49 5BA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development in terms of the Council's spatial strategy; and access to local services, facilities and public transport
- the effect of the proposed development on the provision of local primary school education
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the situation in respect of local housing land supply (HLS)
- other related planning matters, including any benefits of the proposed development to be weighed in the planning balance
What decided it
The significant shortfall in the Council's five-year housing land supply engaged the tilted balance, and the identified harms did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the very significant benefits of the housing (including affordable housing) delivered.
The limited harm to access to services, moderate harm to primary school provision, moderate harm to character and appearance, and limited harm from loss of potential BMVAL were outweighed by the very significant benefits of delivering up to 160 dwellings including 40% affordable housing in the context of a significant shortfall in 5-year housing land supply, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STRAT1Policy H1Policy C1 (CNDP)Policy DES1Policy TRANS2Policy TRANS5Policy TRANS4Policy INF1Policy ENV1Policy DES7Policy H9Policy CF5Policy EP3Policy ENV3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 78Paragraph 11Paragraph 14Paragraph 115Paragraph 187
- Judgments
- Ivan Crane v SoSCLG and Harborough District Council [2015] EWHC 425 (Admin); Edith Weston Parish Council v SoSHCLG and Rutland County Council [2025] EWHC 2908 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Oxfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed7 October 20266005521Land Rear of The Paddocks, Lower Icknield Way, Chinnor, OX39 4GR
- Allowed9 September 20266011224The Elms, Woodperry Road, Beckley, OX3 9UZ
- Allowed4 September 20266007396Emmanuel Ranch, Windmill Road, Towersey, Thame, OX9 3QH
- Allowed23 July 20266006870Nicholas Hill Cottage, Tilebarn Lane, Henley, RG91RN
- Allowed7 July 20266005839Land at Watlington Road, Lewknor, OX49 5TS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®