®Planning appeal decision
Third Floor Flat, 18 Stukeley Street, London, London, WC2B 5LR
Planning appeal 3370592 at Third Floor Flat, 18 Stukeley Street, London, London, WC2B 5LR (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 22 June 2026 by Inspector Ollerenshaw M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the developments on the supply of housing.
without planning permission: following the demolition of the pre-existing fourth floor single storey extension, the erection of a double-storey roof extension with a roof terrace, located at fourth and fifth floors of the property, for use as 2 units of temporary sleep accommodation
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Ollerenshaw M
- Postcode
- WC2B 5LR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the developments on the supply of housing
- the effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
- the effect on highway safety, with regard to car parking
What decided it
The use of the units as temporary sleeping accommodation constitutes a material change of use from C3 dwellinghouse that harms the Council's housing supply and creates potential for noise and disturbance to neighbouring residents, contrary to the development plan, with no material considerations to justify the breaches.
The limited positive weight attributed to the efficient use of units during the marketing period and social and economic benefits of short-term letting opportunities does not outweigh the harm to permanent housing stock and the Council's objective to boost housing supply, and the harm to neighbouring living conditions from noise and disturbance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H1Policy H3Policy E3Policy A1Policy A4Policy T1Policy T2Policy DM1Policy D1Policy D2London Plan Policy H8London Plan Policy H9High Holborn Vision Supplementary Planning Document (2025)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 58Paragraph 59Paragraph 60
- Judgments
- Gravesham BC v SSE & O'Brien [1982] 47 P&CR 142; [1983] JPL 307; Moore v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2012] EWCA Civ 1202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Camden
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed29 September 20266008940Basement Flat, 226 Finchley Road, London, NW3 6DH
- Notice upheld17 September 20263376816Flat 1, Mexborough, Pratt Street, London, NW1 0BL
- Notice varied and upheld17 September 20263372650107 West End Lane, London, NW6 4SY
- Notice upheld17 September 202633612563 Collard Place, Lonon, NW1 8DU
- Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263356264Flat A, 190 Fordwych Road, London, NW2 3NX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.