Planning appeal decision
Land to the Rear of the Concrete Batching Plant, Picketts Hill, Headley, Bordon, GU35 8TF
Planning appeal 3370608 at Land to the Rear of the Concrete Batching Plant, Picketts Hill, Headley, Bordon, GU35 8TF (East Hampshire District Council) was dismissed on 4 March 2026 by Inspector Thandi B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal upon the integrity of the Wealden Heath Phase II Special Protection Area (SPA).
change of use of land for the creation of a 12 Plot Travelling Showperson's site (comprising the siting of 1 mobile home and 1 touring caravan per plot, alongside the formation of hardstanding, and Showmen's equipment and storage areas)
- Authority
- East Hampshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Thandi B
- Postcode
- GU35 8TF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal upon the integrity of the Wealden Heath Phase II Special Protection Area (SPA)
- The effect of the proposal upon the ecological value of Bordon Sandpit as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC)
- The effect upon the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The likely significant effect upon the Wealden Heath Phase II SPA that cannot be ruled out, which provides a strong reason for refusing the development under NPPF paragraph 11(d)(i).
The substantial weight given to unmet need for travelling showpeople pitches and the personal circumstances of the appellant was outweighed by the very significant weight attached to the likely significant effect on the Wealden Heath Phase II SPA, the significant harm to the ecological value of Bordon Sandpit SINC, and the unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area, resulting in dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP22Policy CP21Policy CP15Policy CP20Policy CP29
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 28
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [JPL, 1982, P37]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hampshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed29 October 2026601335385 Chase Road, Lindford, Bordon, GU35 0RS
- Allowed29 October 202660133689 Nightjar Road, Bordon, GU35 0GJ
- Allowed28 October 20266012533362 Catherington Lane, Catherington, Waterlooville, PO8 0TU
- Dismissed27 October 20266011297Land Rear of 74 - 76 Sunderton Lane, Clanfield, PO8 0NT
- Allowed12 October 20266006152Hurlands, Gentles Lane, Passfield, Liphook, GU30 7RY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®