Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 January 20263370817

12 Whittlesey Street, London, SE1 8SZ

the erection of a single storey rear extension in place of the existing extension, together with the erection of 2 single storey outbuildings following the demolition of the existing outbuilding, and other associated alterations, without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 23/03941/FUL, dated 19 April 2024

Authority
London Borough of Lambeth
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Rogers J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether condition No.3 is reasonable and necessary in the interests of preserving the Grade II listed building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses and preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the Roupell Street Conservation Area

What decided it

The use of a condition controlling materials in an extension to a listed building within a conservation area is clearly necessary and reasonable given the statutory duty under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.

Plan policies cited: Policy Q5, Policy Q8, Policy Q11, Policy Q20, Policy Q22

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.