Planning appeal decision
Dismissed3 December 20253371027
31 Chapman Crescent, Harrow, HA3 0TG
use of property as a 6 bed, 6 person HMO
- Authority
- London Borough of Brent
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Livingstone C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the location of the site is suitable for the proposed development
- whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants with regard to internal communal amenity space
- the effect of the proposal on the safe and efficient operation of the local highway network with regard to parking provision
- whether the proposed development makes suitable provision for sustainable travel with regard to parking provision and cycle storage
What decided it
The location's poor public transport accessibility (PTAL 2) fails to meet the minimum PTAL 3 requirement in the HMO SPD for shared accommodation, making the site unsuitable for the proposed development.
Plan policies cited: Policy BH7, Policy DMP1, Policy BT2, Policy T5
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®