Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 December 20253371027

31 Chapman Crescent, Harrow, HA3 0TG

use of property as a 6 bed, 6 person HMO

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Livingstone C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the location of the site is suitable for the proposed development
  • whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants with regard to internal communal amenity space
  • the effect of the proposal on the safe and efficient operation of the local highway network with regard to parking provision
  • whether the proposed development makes suitable provision for sustainable travel with regard to parking provision and cycle storage

What decided it

The location's poor public transport accessibility (PTAL 2) fails to meet the minimum PTAL 3 requirement in the HMO SPD for shared accommodation, making the site unsuitable for the proposed development.

Plan policies cited: Policy BH7, Policy DMP1, Policy BT2, Policy T5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.