Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 October 20253371253

75 Eastbournia Avenue, London, N9 0RU

single storey infill extension, L-shaped dormer extension with front rooflights and the change of use from a single dwelling (Class C3) to a 6-bed, 6-person HMO (Class C4) with the provision of refuse and cycle storage

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Caines A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would make suitable provision for refuse storage, including the effect on the character and appearance of the area and pedestrian safety
  • Whether the development would make suitable provision for cycle storage
  • Whether the development would provide an acceptable standard of accommodation for the occupiers, having particular regard to the head height in bedroom 6

What decided it

The inadequate provision for refuse and cycle storage, which would conflict with development plan policies and the Framework's objectives for well-designed, inclusive and sustainable places, with the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the limited housing benefits.

The benefits of housing choice and efficient use of existing stock were given limited weight; the significant harm from inadequate refuse and cycle storage provision was given substantial weight, resulting in adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing benefits under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.

Framework references: 11, 57

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy D6, London Plan Policy T5, Enfield Core Strategy Core Policy CP30, Enfield Core Strategy Core Policy 4, Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD5, Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD8, Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD37, Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD45, Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD47

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.