Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 November 20253371355

28 Highclere, Sunninghill, Berkshire, SL5 0AA

the erection of a new raised roof to accommodate 2 No bedrooms and bathrooms, single-storey side extensions, and new porch/verandah to front elevation

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Allan J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal upon the host dwelling and wider street scene

What decided it

The bulky and incongruous appearance of the front dormers, which would fail to display a quality of design respecting local character and appearance in conflict with Policies QP1, QP3 and the neighbourhood plan design policies.

Plan policies cited: Policy QP1, Policy QP3, Policy NP/DG1, Policy NP/DG2, Policy NP/DG3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.