Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld9 March 20263371512

7 Matty Marsden Lane, Horbury, WAKEFIELD, WF4 6EY

without planning permission (i) the construction of a retaining wall; (ii) the carrying out of engineering operations resulting in a material change in levels of the rear garden, and (iii) the formation of an access road on the Land

Authority
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Hartley D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the breach of planning control constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt including its effect on Green Belt openness and purposes
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area including whether it constitutes poor design
  • If the breach of planning control is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify development

What decided it

The retaining wall and land level changes constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt that causes substantial harm to openness and fails to accord with Green Belt purposes, and this harm is not clearly outweighed by any other considerations amounting to very special circumstances.

Framework references: 154, 155, 12

Plan policies cited: SP3, SP23, LP55, LP56

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.