Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld1 June 20263371705

Land at Low Banks, 18 Nursery Road, BRADFORD, BD7 4LH

without planning permission, the construction of 3no. dormer window extensions to the north facing elevation and 2no. dormer window extensions to the south facing elevation of the property

Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Bartlett R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the requirements of the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control or injury to amenity (ground f)
  • Whether the period for compliance of 4 months is reasonable (ground g)

What decided it

The period for compliance of 4 months was unreasonable and fell short of what should be allowed, warranting extension to 12 months to allow proper appointment of a builder and completion of works whilst minimising disruption to the family.

The need to remedy the injury to amenity caused by the breach was balanced against the interests of the appellant and his family, with the extended 12-month period achieving an appropriate balance between these considerations.

Judgments cited: Tapecrown Limited v The First Secretary of State & Anr [2006] EWCA Civ 1744; Mansi v Elstree RDC [1964] 16 P&CR 153

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.