Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 March 20263371729

Mount Clare Campus, Minstead Gardens, Roehampton Gate, SW15 4EE

use as hostel accommodation (sui generis) with associated landscaping and cycle parking

Authority
London Borough of Wandsworth
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Parsons J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade I listed building known as Clare Mount House and a Grade II* listed building known as The Temple, along with setting or features of special architectural or historic interest that each possesses; preserve a Grade II Alton West Registered Park and Garden; preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Alton Conservation Area (CA)
  • Whether the proposal would optimise site capacity, having regard to dwelling type, AH, mixed and balanced communities, local plan allocation and best use of land, and residents' accessibility to services and facilities
  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable play space provision
  • Whether the proposal would result in a high-quality living accommodation

What decided it

The failure to optimise the capacity of the site allocation, given the lack of detailed re-use proposals for the highly significant Grade I and Grade II* listed buildings on the remainder of the site, was attributed substantial, overriding weight against the proposal.

The substantial housing, social, economic, re-use and sustainability benefits of the TA proposal did not outweigh the conflicts with the development plan, particularly the failure to optimise site capacity in relation to the heritage assets, and full weight was given to the primacy of the development plan, resulting in dismissal.

Framework references: 58

Plan policies cited: WLP Policy LP3, WLP Policy PM7, LP Policy HC1, WLP Policy LP23, LP Policy H4, LP Policy H5, WLP Policy LP31, WLP Policy LP29, WLP Policy LP24, LP Policy H10, LP Policy GG4, WLP Policy RO2, LP Policy D3, WLP Policy LP19, LP Policy S4, LP Policy T1, LP Policy T2, WLP Policy LP50, WLP Policy LP27, LP Policy D5, LP Policy D6, LP Policy SI 2, WLP Policy LP10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.