Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 March 20263371729

Mount Clare Campus, Minstead Gardens, Roehampton Gate, SW15 4EE

Planning appeal 3371729 at Mount Clare Campus, Minstead Gardens, Roehampton Gate, SW15 4EE (London Borough of Wandsworth) was dismissed on 9 March 2026 by Inspector Parsons J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade I listed building known as Clare Mount House and a Grade II* listed building known as The Temple, along with setting or features of special architectural or historic interest that each possesses; preserve a Grade II Alton West Registered Park and Garden; preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Alton Conservation Area (CA).

use as hostel accommodation (sui generis) with associated landscaping and cycle parking

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Parsons J
Postcode
SW15 4EE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade I listed building known as Clare Mount House and a Grade II* listed building known as The Temple, along with setting or features of special architectural or historic interest that each possesses; preserve a Grade II Alton West Registered Park and Garden; preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Alton Conservation Area (CA)
  • Whether the proposal would optimise site capacity, having regard to dwelling type, AH, mixed and balanced communities, local plan allocation and best use of land, and residents' accessibility to services and facilities
  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable play space provision
  • Whether the proposal would result in a high-quality living accommodation

What decided it

The failure to optimise the capacity of the site allocation, given the lack of detailed re-use proposals for the highly significant Grade I and Grade II* listed buildings on the remainder of the site, was attributed substantial, overriding weight against the proposal.

The substantial housing, social, economic, re-use and sustainability benefits of the TA proposal did not outweigh the conflicts with the development plan, particularly the failure to optimise site capacity in relation to the heritage assets, and full weight was given to the primacy of the development plan, resulting in dismissal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
WLP Policy LP3WLP Policy PM7LP Policy HC1WLP Policy LP23LP Policy H4LP Policy H5WLP Policy LP31WLP Policy LP29WLP Policy LP24LP Policy H10LP Policy GG4WLP Policy RO2LP Policy D3WLP Policy LP19LP Policy S4LP Policy T1LP Policy T2WLP Policy LP50WLP Policy LP27LP Policy D5LP Policy D6LP Policy SI 2WLP Policy LP10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 58

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

176 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Wandsworth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266011378
    First and Second Floor Maisonette, 184 Putney Bridge Road, London, SW15 2NG
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266011258
    8 Mysore Road, London, SW11 5SB
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266010452
    72 Frensham Drive, London, SW15 3EF
  4. Allowed26 October 20266013180
    23, Sutherland Grove, London, SW18 5PS
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266014390
    5 Banbury Street,, London, SW11 3EJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.