Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld13 July 20263371901

139 & 139A Elliott Street, Tyldesley, Manchester, M29 8FL

without planning permission, the removal of original single glazed slash timber frames with ornate lead and stained glass upper panels x4, removal of original single glazed sash timber frames and plain glass windows x11, removal of original timber frames and doors with single glazed upper panel x2 and removal of original single glazed timber framed shop front window, sandstone and brickwork and their replacement with uPVC frames and modern glazing from the building on the Land

Authority
Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hartley D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control or injury to amenity (ground (f))

What decided it

The enforcement notice's requirements are not excessive because their purpose is to remedy the breach by restoring the property to its condition prior to the breach, and the Inspector cannot consider alternative designs or planning merits without a ground (a) appeal.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.