Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 November 20253372009

34 Churchill Drive, Charlton Kings, Cheltenham , Gloucestershire , GL52 6JJ

Planning appeal 3372009 at 34 Churchill Drive, Charlton Kings, Cheltenham , Gloucestershire , GL52 6JJ (Cheltenham Borough Council) was dismissed on 21 November 2025 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

two 1-bedroom dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Townend K
Postcode
GL52 6JJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the development on the integrity of the Cotswolds Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC)

What decided it

The adverse effects on character and appearance from introducing two separate dwellings in the rear garden, which would disrupt the prevailing grain of the area and fail to integrate with the context, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits.

the adverse effects on character and appearance, afforded significant weight, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of delivering two new dwellings, resulting in the presumption in favour of sustainable development not applying

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SD4 of the Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031Policy D1 of the Cheltenham Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11
Judgments
Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

111 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cheltenham Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed23 October 20266011141
    St Stephens Sports & Social Club, 52 Tivoli Street, Cheltenham, GL50 2UW
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266014525
    20 Marle Hill Road, Cheltenham, GL50 4LP
  3. Allowed30 September 20266010276
    76 Andover Road, Cheltenham, GL50 2TW
  4. Dismissed4 September 20266008569
    Land On The South Side Of Glenfall Way, Cheltenham, GL52 6XZ
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266008771
    17 Shelley Road, Cheltenham, GL51 7DN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.