Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 December 20253372772

4 Ely Gardens, ILFORD, IG1 3NQ

described on the application form as “proposed ground and first floor side extension and first floor rear extension. Will be built of cavity wall with facing bricks to match existing. With hip roof. The front elevation porch will be extended. This proposal will allow for a study room and a family room to the ground floor, first floor will allow for ensuite to front and rear”

Authority
London Borough of Redbridge
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Everitt E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed rear extension would appear subservient to the existing property and would not appear incongruous within the street scene, particularly given the similar existing extension at the adjacent property.

Plan policies cited: Policy LP26, Policy LP30

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.