Planning appeal decision
Land North of Rounds Gardens, Rugby, CV21 2BS
Planning appeal 3373251 at Land North of Rounds Gardens, Rugby, CV21 2BS (Rugby Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 March 2026 by Inspector Jones M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular reference to (i) urban design; and (ii) protected trees.
redevelopment of the former football pitch and tennis courts associated with the adjacent employment use, including demolition of the existing pavilion and all other remaining structures and enclosures relating to the previous use of the site; and the erect ion of 115 dwellings, accesses, landscaping, parking, drainage features and associated works
- Authority
- Rugby Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Jones M
- Postcode
- CV21 2BS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular reference to (i) urban design; and (ii) protected trees
- whether the proposal would lead to the unacceptable loss of sports and recreational buildings and land
- other considerations, including housing land supply
What decided it
The scheme's failure to be well-designed, in conflict with Policy SDC1 and the Framework's design policies, was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the substantial housing and brownfield redevelopment benefits, even applying the tilted balance under paragraph 11d)ii).
The substantial benefits of housing delivery, brownfield redevelopment and economic activity were outweighed by the design harm (and, to a lesser extent, the loss of sports and recreation land), such that under paragraph 11d)ii) the adverse impacts of granting permission significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SDC1Policy SDC2Policy NE2Policy NE3Policy HS4Policy DS1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 78Paragraph 104Paragraph 136Paragraph 232
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd vs the Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rugby
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed8 October 2026600912241 Bow Fell, Rugby, CV21 1JF
- Dismissed28 August 20266012503Hall Farm, High Street, Marton, CV23 9RR
- Dismissed13 August 20266009342Land to the North of the Old Dairy, Coton House Estate, Rugby, CV23 0UT
- Dismissed24 June 20266006403Manor Farm, Flecknoe Road, Flecknoe, CV23 8AT
- Dismissed22 May 20266003106Land East of Rugby Road, Clifton-upon-Dunsmore, Rugby, CV23 0DF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®