Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 December 20253373364

1-6 The Drive, London, NW10 3UB

Planning appeal 3373364 at 1-6 The Drive, London, NW10 3UB (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 22 December 2025 by Inspector Jones H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties on Longstone Avenue, with particular regard to sunlight and outlook.

demolition of existing buildings and garages and erection of 9 x new residential dwellinghouses with associated off street parking, garden space, bike storage and bin storage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones H
Postcode
NW10 3UB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties on Longstone Avenue, with particular regard to sunlight and outlook
  • Whether the proposed access arrangements would be safe and suitable for future users, including emergency service vehicles
  • Whether the development would make adequate provision for affordable housing
  • Whether the development would achieve sufficient biodiversity net gains

What decided it

The harmful effects on neighbouring living conditions through loss of sunlight and outlook, combined with unsafe and unsuitable access arrangements for emergency vehicles and other users, and failure to secure affordable housing provision, collectively outweighed the benefits of housing supply and brownfield redevelopment.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP1Policy D12Policy BT1Policy BT3Policy BH5Policy BGI1Policy G6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

562 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011176
    7 Chalfont Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6NW
  2. Allowed22 October 20266011738
    102 West Hill, Wembley, HA9 9RR
  3. Allowed9 October 20266010212
    276 Willesden Lane, London, NW2 5RB
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266013509
    115 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY
  5. Allowed1 October 20266011602
    28A Ridley Road, London, NW10 5UA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.