Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 January 20263373748

Hazel Cottage, Hibbert Road, Maidenhead, Windsor And Maidenhead, SL6 1UT

Planning appeal 3373748 at Hazel Cottage, Hibbert Road, Maidenhead, Windsor And Maidenhead, SL6 1UT (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 9 January 2026 by Inspector Phillips B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would comply with national planning policy which seeks to steer new development away from areas at the highest risk of flooding.

a garage with external staircase and front dormer, following demolition of the existing garage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Phillips B
Postcode
SL6 1UT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would comply with national planning policy which seeks to steer new development away from areas at the highest risk of flooding
  • whether the proposal would preserve the listed building or its setting, or any features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with specific reference to trees

What decided it

The proposals would lead to increased flood risk elsewhere due to inadequate clarity and certainty regarding the design and visual impact of required flood mitigation measures in a sensitive listed building context, conflicting with Policy NR1 and national planning policy.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NR1Policy HE1Policy QP3Policy NR3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

106 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed27 October 20266007126
    Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
  2. Allowed26 October 20266014376
    Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266009694
    Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266009005
    59 to 61 and Land to the Rear of 59 to 61 St Leonard's Road, Windsor, SL4 3BX
  5. Notice upheld24 September 20263353235
    Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.