Planning appeal decision
Igar Hotel, 116-124 Salusbury Road, London, NW6 6PB
Planning appeal 3373777 at Igar Hotel, 116-124 Salusbury Road, London, NW6 6PB (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 26 March 2026 by Inspector Cryan M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Queens Park Conservation Area.
the creation of basement level and rear extensions at ground to second floors to create 79 rooms, formation of internal courtyards, reconfiguration of existing layouts, provision for car parking, cycle and refuse storage, landscaping and boundary treatment to hotel
- Authority
- London Borough of Brent
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- community-institutional · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Cryan M
- Postcode
- NW6 6PB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Queens Park Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposed development on living conditions for occupiers of neighbouring properties at 114 and 126 Salusbury Road, with particular regard to loss of privacy, outlook or daylight
- Whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the size of bedrooms and communal facilities, and the provision of daylight in communal spaces
- Whether the development would make adequate provision for safe loading and servicing, with particular regard to its effect on highway safety
What decided it
The harm to the character and appearance of the Queens Park Conservation Area caused by the infilling of the angled corners at first and second floor levels, combined with inadequate living conditions for future residents and insufficient servicing provision, was not outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BHC1Policy HC1Policy DMP1Policy BH7Policy BT2Policy BT3Policy BGI2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 202Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Brent
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Planning permission granted25 September 2026337716026 Sidmouth Road, London, NW2 5HJ
- Notice varied and upheld21 August 20263346972The Lodge Restaurant, The Lodge, Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9HA
- Notice varied and upheld14 August 20263364758Flats 1-3, 11 Blenheim Gardens, London, NW2 4NL
- Notice varied and upheld12 August 2026334379010 Stewart Close, London, NW9 8AJ
- Split Decision10 August 2026334980910 Birchen Grove, London, NW9 8SA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®