Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 December 20253373925

83-85 High Street, CROYDON, CR0 1QF

‘proposed 3 storey rear extension to provide 3 new apartments and the conversion of the existing roof space to create an enlarged top floor apartment, with the provision of refuse storage, cycle storage and private amenity, including the retention of 4 apart ments and existing commercial areas’

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Walker C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the locally listed building (LLB)
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupants with particular regard to outlook and daylight
  • the suitability of the proposed cycle parking facilities
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety with particular regard to parking and whether it is necessary for the proposal to provide a contribution towards sustainable transport
  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision for refuse storage facilities

What decided it

The cumulative effect of moderate harm to the locally listed building, unacceptable living conditions for future occupants due to inadequate daylight, failure to provide adequate cycle parking for all users, and inability to secure a robust car-free development mechanism to mitigate highway safety impacts collectively outweighed the benefits of additional housing.

Framework references: 216, 73

Plan policies cited: Policy DM18, Policy DM10, Policy D3, London Plan Policy HC1, London Plan Policy D6, London Plan Policy T5, Policy DM30, Policy T6, Policy SP8, Policy DM29, Policy DM13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.