Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 July 20263373977

45 St. James's Park, Lansdown, Bath, BA1 2SX

Planning appeal 3373977 at 45 St. James's Park, Lansdown, Bath, BA1 2SX (Bath and North East Somerset Council) was dismissed on 13 July 2026 by Inspector Hartley D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded with particular regard to whether the proposal amounts to a material change of use under section 55 of the Act and whether planning permission is required for it.

the reversion of the property from a studio flat and maisonette back into a single dwellinghouse

Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hartley D
Postcode
BA1 2SX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded with particular regard to whether the proposal amounts to a material change of use under section 55 of the Act and whether planning permission is required for it

What decided it

The net loss of one residential unit in the context of a very poor housing land supply position (2.5 years deliverable supply against a 5.0-year requirement) and acute housing need constitutes a material planning consequence that engages planning control.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H5 of the Bath and North East Somerset Local Plan 2011-2029
Judgments
R (oao) The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v (1) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (2) David Reis (3) Gianna Tong [2016] EWHC 1785 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

205 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bath and North East Somerset

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011461
    63 Newbridge Road, Bath, BA1 3HF
  2. Allowed24 September 20266010597
    43 Oriel Grove, Bath, BA2 1JE
  3. Allowed16 September 20266008719
    34 Banwell Road, Odd Down, Bath, BA2 2UJ
  4. Allowed19 August 20266005916
    Parcel 1643 Middle Piece Lane, Burnett, Keynsham, BS31 2ED
  5. Dismissed17 August 20266006951
    Pavement O/S Odeon, Kingsmead Leisure Complex, James Street West, Bath, BA1 2BX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.