Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 December 20253374333

Dudfleet Mill, Dudfleet Yard, Horbury, WF4 5EU

Planning appeal 3374333 at Dudfleet Mill, Dudfleet Yard, Horbury, WF4 5EU (Wakefield Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 19 December 2025 by Inspector Clark J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies, and the effect on openness and the purposes of the Green Belt.

Concrete yard and security fencing

Authority
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Other minor developments
Inspector
Clark J
Postcode
WF4 5EU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies, and the effect on openness and the purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effect on the character and setting of the non-designated heritage asset, Dudfleet Mill
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby residential properties with regard to noise
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness and conflict with Green Belt purposes, and the very special circumstances required to justify such development do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP3Policy LP62Policy LP65(b)Policy SP23Policy LP56(n)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 85Paragraph 87Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

37 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed14 September 20266006811
    Hall Croft House, Castleford Road, Normanton, WF6 2DN
  2. Notice varied and upheld24 August 20263361281
    Wragby Grange, Doncaster Road, Wragby, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF4 1QX
  3. Dismissed10 August 20266004277
    Land At Back Lane, Woolley, Wakefield, WF4 2JT
  4. Allowed10 July 20266006858
    Land at, Pontefract Road, Pontefract, WF11 8RJ
  5. Allowed2 July 20263368025
    Land South of Wakefield B Substation, And East of Neil Fox Way, Wakefield, WF1 5DB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.