Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed19 May 20263374388

27 Piggotts End, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, HP7 0JF

Planning appeal 3374388 at 27 Piggotts End, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, HP7 0JF (Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *) was allowed on 19 May 2026 by Inspector Hall R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of No 29, with particular regard to light and outlook.

‘part two storey, part single storey rear extension’

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hall R
Postcode
HP7 0JF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of No 29, with particular regard to light and outlook
  • whether the proposal is acceptable with respect to biodiversity, with particular regard to bats
  • whether the proposal is acceptable with respect to archaeology

What decided it

The particular topography of the site with steeply falling rear ground levels meant the proposed extension would not result in harmful loss of light, outlook or an overbearing appearance to the neighbouring property, combined with the bat scoping study demonstrating negligible bat roosting potential and the fallback position of permitted development rights justifying the archaeology position.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GC2Policy H14Policy NC1Policy CS24Policy AS1Policy AS2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

60 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Unknown2 March 20263362050
    Land at National Society for Epilepsy, Chesham Lane, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4AD
  2. Dismissed24 August 20213254067
    Holmer Green Farm Penfold Lane, Holmer Green, High Wycombe, HP15 6XW
  3. Dismissed24 September 20263363978
    Southering, Deadhearn Lane, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4HG
  4. Dismissed24 September 20263363975
    Southering, Deadhearn Lane, Chalfont St. Giles, HP8 4HG
  5. Dismissed20 May 20263376094
    Mortimer House, Village Road, Ballinger, Buckinghamshire, HP16 9LQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.