Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed19 May 20263374388

27 Piggotts End, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, HP7 0JF

‘part two storey, part single storey rear extension’

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hall R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of No 29, with particular regard to light and outlook
  • whether the proposal is acceptable with respect to biodiversity, with particular regard to bats
  • whether the proposal is acceptable with respect to archaeology

What decided it

The particular topography of the site with steeply falling rear ground levels meant the proposed extension would not result in harmful loss of light, outlook or an overbearing appearance to the neighbouring property, combined with the bat scoping study demonstrating negligible bat roosting potential and the fallback position of permitted development rights justifying the archaeology position.

Plan policies cited: Policy GC2, Policy H14, Policy NC1, Policy CS24, Policy AS1, Policy AS2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.