Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 January 20263374406

132 St. Andrews Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3HE

Planning appeal 3374406 at 132 St. Andrews Road, Coulsdon, CR5 3HE (London Borough of Croydon) was dismissed on 7 January 2026 by Inspector Knight A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal scheme would result in acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of the appeal site, with particular regard to the layout and floorspace in Flat C, the rearward outlook from Flat A, and accessibility.

conversion of existing dwelling to flatted accommodation creating two new dwellings (three total). Proposed single storey rear/side/front extension. First floor rear and side extension. Loft conversion and rear/side dormer. Internal alterations

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Knight A
Postcode
CR5 3HE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal scheme would result in acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of the appeal site, with particular regard to the layout and floorspace in Flat C, the rearward outlook from Flat A, and accessibility

What decided it

The proposed development fails to provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, particularly regarding the substandard floorspace and layout of Flat C and the poor outlook and oppressive enclosure of Flat A, which conflicts with Policy D6 of the London Plan and Policies SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan, and these policy conflicts are not outweighed by the moderate benefits of the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D6Policy D7Policy H2Policy SP4Policy SP2Policy DM10

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

160 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Croydon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015751
    20 Newark Road, South Croydon, CR2 6HQ
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014574
    58 Kingswood Way, South Croydon, CR2 8QQ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266013110
    7 Quadrant Road, Thornton Heath, Croydon, CR7 7DB
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266014301
    77-81, North End, Croydon, CR0 1TJ
  5. Dismissed22 October 20266009641
    3 The Spinney, Off Warren Road, Purley, CR8 1AB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.