Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 March 20263374409

66 Queen Elizabeths Walk, London, N16 5UQ

Planning appeal 3374409 at 66 Queen Elizabeths Walk, London, N16 5UQ (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 13 March 2026 by Inspector Storey P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of existing shed and construction of 2 -storey 3p residence as infill between the flank walls of nos 66 and 68 Queen Elizabeth's Walk

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Storey P
Postcode
N16 5UQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the obligations necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms would be secured
  • whether the proposed development would have an acceptable effect on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties, with specific regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to character and appearance caused by the loss of characteristic separation and disruption of the established urban grain, combined with the failure to secure necessary planning obligations through completed legal mechanisms, outweighed the modest housing supply benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D4Policy D14Policy H4Policy H5Policy LP1Policy LP2Policy LP12Policy LP13Policy LP43Policy LP45Policy LP55Policy LP58Policy SI2Policy T1Policy T4

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 821 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Notice varied and upheld18 September 20263360724
    2B Woodberry Down, Hackney, London, N4 2TG
  2. Allowed17 August 20266010972
    101 Dalston Lane, London, E8 1NH
  3. Allowed14 July 20266004379
    152 Bethune Road, London, N16 5DS
  4. Dismissed14 May 20266003534
    212 Millfields Road, London, E5 0AR
  5. Dismissed12 May 20263371819
    Railway Arches 348-349 Bocking Street, Hackney, London, E8 3RU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.