Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 January 20263374441

62 Powys Lane, London, N13 4HS

Planning appeal 3374441 at 62 Powys Lane, London, N13 4HS (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 21 January 2026 by Inspector Skelly C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the residential amenity of future occupants with regards to internal layout, noise, disturbance, outside space, outlook and privacy.

conversion of single family dwelling into 6 x self contained flats, involving 2-storey side extension, extension to existing basement, single storey rear infill extension, 2 x rear dormers, front rooflights, with privacy screens at rear with terrace/ balcon ies at rear ground and 1st floor together with, associated parking and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Skelly C
Postcode
N13 4HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the residential amenity of future occupants with regards to internal layout, noise, disturbance, outside space, outlook and privacy
  • Whether the proposed development would meet local housing needs
  • Flood risk

What decided it

The creation of significantly unacceptable living conditions for future occupants, particularly regarding internal layout, overheating, noise and disturbance, and lack of adequate private outside space, demonstrably outweighs the benefits of five additional dwellings when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

The benefits of providing five additional dwellings and re-using previously developed land were outweighed by the significantly unacceptable living conditions that would be created for future occupants, with the importance of providing appropriate living standards being the decisive consideration under the tilted balance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMD5Policy DMD9Policy DMD59Policy DMD60Policy DMD61Policy DMD62Policy C5Policy C21Policy C28Policy D5Policy D6Policy H3Policy H10Policy SI12Policy SI13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 8
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

533 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed7 May 20263336102
    70 Sketty Road, Enfield, EN1 3SF
  2. Allowed24 March 20266003066
    45 Park Road, Enfield, EN3 6SP
  3. Dismissed23 March 20263375785
    5 Cocker Road, Enfield, London, EN1 4QQ
  4. Dismissed17 March 20266003971
    5 Ramscroft Close, London, N9 9JY
  5. Allowed10 March 20266004174
    256 Bury Street West, London, N9 9LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.