Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 April 20263374768

The Coppice Startins Lane, Cookham, MAIDENHEAD, SL6 9AN

Ground floor extension to the existing garage to accommodate larger vehicle parking, addition of a first floor for incidental accommodation, and a 1.1m increase to the existing ridge height

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Simpson V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the scheme would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposed extension would constitute disproportionate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it, as the harm to openness and inappropriateness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.