Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 February 20263375087

90 Preston Hill, Harrow, HA3 9SG

Planning appeal 3375087 at 90 Preston Hill, Harrow, HA3 9SG (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 2 February 2026 by Inspector Armstrong N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the property would be suitable for the proposed development, with particular reference to its location, standard of accommodation and the effect on the provision of family housing.

Change of use from dwellinghouse C3 to HMO C4 to include hard and soft landscaping, cycle storage, refuse and recycling storage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Armstrong N
Postcode
HA3 9SG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the property would be suitable for the proposed development, with particular reference to its location, standard of accommodation and the effect on the provision of family housing
  • whether the requirements of Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) are relevant to the appeal scheme and, if so, whether such requirements are met
  • the effect of the development on parking provision, sustainable travel, and highway and pedestrian safety

What decided it

The site's unsuitability for HMO development due to its poor public transport accessibility (PTAL 2), lack of nearby amenities, and substandard internal accommodation standards, combined with the loss of family housing in an area with significant need for such accommodation, outweighed any benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BH7Policy DMP1Policy D6Policy BT2Policy BGI1Policy T6.1Policy T6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

480 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Planning permission granted25 September 20263377160
    26 Sidmouth Road, London, NW2 5HJ
  2. Notice varied and upheld21 August 20263346972
    The Lodge Restaurant, The Lodge, Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9HA
  3. Notice varied and upheld14 August 20263364758
    Flats 1-3, 11 Blenheim Gardens, London, NW2 4NL
  4. Notice varied and upheld12 August 20263343790
    10 Stewart Close, London, NW9 8AJ
  5. Split Decision10 August 20263349809
    10 Birchen Grove, London, NW9 8SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.