Planning appeal decision
88 Headland Road, Leicester, LE5 6AD
Planning appeal 3375206 at 88 Headland Road, Leicester, LE5 6AD (Leicester City Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 10 August 2026 by Inspector Dale A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effects of the works at the front upon the visual amenity of the host property and its surroundings.
- Authority
- Leicester City Council
- Appeal type
- Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Dale A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effects of the works at the front upon the visual amenity of the host property and its surroundings
- the effects of the rear extension upon the residential amenity of the neighbouring property at no. 90
What decided it
The front works and rear extension cause unacceptable harm to visual amenity and neighbouring residential amenity respectively, with no conditions capable of overcoming the harm, and the enforcement notice requirements are proportionate to remedy the breach.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leicester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Notice upheld10 August 20263375592337 Narborough Road, Leicester, LE3 2RD
- Notice varied and upheld18 May 202633773552-4 Colton Street, Leicester, LE1 1QA
- Dismissed13 May 2026336180033 Parker Drive, Leicester, LE4 0JP
- Dismissed7 May 20263373950219 Clarendon Park Road, Leicester Sikh Centre, Land Adjacent to 92 Adderley Road, LE2 3AN
- Notice upheld7 May 20263372671174 Maidstone Road, Leicester, Leicestershire , LE2 0BA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®