Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 February 20263375212

Pavement Outside University Of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Kings Gate Barras Bridge, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU

Planning appeal 3375212 at Pavement Outside University Of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Kings Gate Barras Bridge, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU (Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council) was dismissed on 27 February 2026 by Inspector Livingstone C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with reference to the setting of the Claremont Buildings.

the installation of a modern, multifunction Hub unit featuring an integral advertisement display and defibrillator

Authority
Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Livingstone C
Postcode
NE1 7RU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with reference to the setting of the Claremont Buildings
  • Highway safety

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the Claremont Buildings' heritage significance without clear and convincing justification, and would unacceptably compromise highway and pedestrian safety at a busy bus stop through restricted sightlines.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy C1Policy UC5Policy UC11Policy UC13Policy CS15Policy CS13Policy DM20Policy DM10Policy DM14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 119Paragraph 141Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

238 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011104
    14 Tavistock Road, Jesmond, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE2 3JA
  2. Dismissed8 October 20266003993
    1 Mosley St and 128-130 Pilgrim St, Newcastle, NE1 1YE
  3. Dismissed24 September 20266005950
    111-115 Grainger Street, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 5AE
  4. Unknown9 September 20263367275
    11-13 Moor Road South, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE3 1NN
  5. Notice upheld9 September 20263367274
    11-13 Moor Road South, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE3 1NN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.