Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 June 20263375352

Cherrytree Cottage, Bedford Lane, Ascot, Windsor And Maidenhead, SL5 0NP

staircase extension (6.6sqm), roof raised to create new floorspace at first floor level (32.6sqm) and first floor balcony

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hole K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The substantial weight attached to the inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with harm to character and appearance, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist to justify the proposal.

the substantial weight to be given to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness and harm to character and appearance of the area was not clearly outweighed by other considerations

Framework references: 154, 142, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5, Policy QP3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.