Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 February 20263375405

LAND ADJACENT TO SPRING HOUSE, MANNINGS HILL, CRANLEIGH, GU6 8QN

the erection of a single uncovered padel court to be used for leisure purposes ‘incidental’ to the main dwelling Spring House

Authority
Waverley Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Simms S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the natural beauty and purposes of the nearby Surrey Hills National Landscape
  • the effect of the proposal, particularly artificial lighting, on local wildlife
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and conflict with the purposes of including land within it, and the benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm and other identified harms to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy RE2, Policy RE3, Policy TD1, Policy DM1, Policy DM4, Policy NE1, Policy CRAN6:A.e

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.