Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 February 20263375586

23 St George's Street, Canterbury, CT1 2JT

Planning appeal 3375586 at 23 St George's Street, Canterbury, CT1 2JT (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 13 February 2026 by Inspector James A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the advertisement on amenity, including whether the proposal preserves a Grade II listed building (23, St George's Street) and any features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.

Erection of composite aluminium advertisement featuring the Arora family logo (1200mm x 600mm, black and gold) on the flank wall of a Grade II listed building

Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
James A
Postcode
CT1 2JT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the advertisement on amenity, including whether the proposal preserves a Grade II listed building (23, St George's Street) and any features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
  • Whether the proposal preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the conservation area

What decided it

The use of modern composite aluminium material and the resulting visual clutter on the listed building's flank elevation would cause harm to amenity and fail to preserve the special interest of the listed building and the character of the conservation area, with insufficient public benefits to justify this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HE9Policy DBE3Policy HE1Policy HE4Policy HE5Policy HE6Policy HE8Policy HE10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 9Paragraph 85Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

75 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed13 February 20263375590
    36-37 High Street, Canterbury, CT1 2RY
  2. Dismissed13 February 20263375589
    8 - 9 Parade Unit 2, Canterbury, CT1 2SG
  3. Dismissed13 February 20263375505
    32 - 33 High Street, Canterbury, CT1 2RY
  4. Dismissed13 February 20263375502
    36-37 High Street, Canterbury, CT1 2RY
  5. Dismissed13 February 20263375500
    8 - 9 Parade, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 2SG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.