Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 March 20263375798

Pavement o/s 21-22 Upper Street, London, N1 0PQ

the installation of a multifunctional communication hub including defibrillator and advertisement display

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Armstrong N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including The Angel Conservation Area and the setting of nearby listed buildings

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area and listed buildings, to which great weight must be given under NPPF paragraph 212, could not be justified by the moderate public benefits of the proposal.

Framework references: 212, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy HC1, Policy PLAN1, Policy DH1, Policy DH2, Policy DH6, Policy ST3, Policy T4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.