Planning appeal decision
43 Glanleam Road, Stanmore, HA7 4NW
Planning appeal 3376270 at 43 Glanleam Road, Stanmore, HA7 4NW (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 27 May 2026 by Inspector Unwin N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the green belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework.
for: Full planning application for the erection of five detached two- storey dwellings with basement level, associated access, parking, landscaping, and boundary treatment, following partial redevelopment of the residential curtilage at 43 Glanleam Road, Stanmore
- Authority
- London Borough of Harrow
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Unwin N
- Postcode
- HA7 4NW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the green belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with specific regard to trees
- the effect of the proposal on biodiversity
- whether the site is suitable for the proposed development, having regard to relevant policies for the location of housing and the Council's spatial strategy
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt which would cause substantial harm to openness and significant harm to character and appearance through tree loss, and these harms are not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery and site suitability.
The benefits of housing delivery and site suitability (moderate weight) do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and significant harm to character and appearance through tree loss, and the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GI1Policy GI4Policy GR1Policy GR10Policy HO1Policy G1Policy G2Policy G6Policy G7Policy G13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Harrow
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Split Decision29 April 2026332575716 Brookshill Avenue, Harrow, HA3 6RZ
- Dismissed11 December 20253365209St. Davids Pinner Hill, Pinner, HA5 3XU
- Dismissed15 October 20253369650Pinnerwood Cottage , Woodhall Road, Pinner, HA5 4UA
- Dismissed8 October 202533661464, Mansion House Drive, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 3GA
- Dismissed9 August 20243343857Weald Cottage Clamp Hill, Harrow Weald, Stanmore,, Harrow, London, HA7 3JL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®