Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 March 20263376442

9 Frederick Crescent, ENFIELD, EN3 7HH

change of use of rear outbuilding from summer house/ gym to a beauty parlour (Class E)

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Murphy S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is suitable for a beauty parlour use, having regard to its location outside of a retail centre
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbours in respect of noise and disturbance, and privacy

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate through a sequential test that no suitable sites are available in or on the edge of the nearby town centre, contrary to Policy DMD25 of the Enfield Development Management Document and paragraph 91 of the NPPF.

Framework references: 91, 135, 198

Plan policies cited: Policy DMD25, Policy CP13, Policy CP17, Policy E2, Policy T1, Policy 30, Policy DMD6, Policy DMD8, Policy DMD12, Policy DMD37, Policy D4, Policy D6, Policy CP30, Policy CP32, Policy DMD68, Policy D14

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.