Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20263376698

124-128 Balls Pond Road, London, N1 4AE

the erection of three storey infill extension at first, second and third floor level (following part demolition of existing building) to deliver 4no. units (1 x 1 bed, 2 x 2 bed and 1 x 3 bed). Replacement of existing hipped roof with mansard roof to create enl arged third floor unit. Associated external alterations. Installation of ASHPs

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Armstrong N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area, with particular regard to the three-storey rear extension
  • whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for the future occupiers of the first and second floor flats, with particular regard to outlook and aspect

What decided it

The proposed three-storey rear extension would remove the existing visual gap and transition between the host building and the adjoining four-storey building, resulting in considerable harmful bulk and massing to the character and appearance of the area, combined with inadequate living conditions for the single aspect Flat 1B.

Plan policies cited: Policy PLAN1, Policy HC1, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy D6, Policy H4, Policy H2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.