Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20263376698

124-128 Balls Pond Road, London, N1 4AE

Planning appeal 3376698 at 124-128 Balls Pond Road, London, N1 4AE (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 22 April 2026 by Inspector Armstrong N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area, with particular regard to the three-storey rear extension.

the erection of three storey infill extension at first, second and third floor level (following part demolition of existing building) to deliver 4no. units (1 x 1 bed, 2 x 2 bed and 1 x 3 bed). Replacement of existing hipped roof with mansard roof to create enl arged third floor unit. Associated external alterations. Installation of ASHPs

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Armstrong N
Postcode
N1 4AE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area, with particular regard to the three-storey rear extension
  • whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for the future occupiers of the first and second floor flats, with particular regard to outlook and aspect

What decided it

The proposed three-storey rear extension would remove the existing visual gap and transition between the host building and the adjoining four-storey building, resulting in considerable harmful bulk and massing to the character and appearance of the area, combined with inadequate living conditions for the single aspect Flat 1B.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PLAN1Policy HC1Policy D3Policy D4Policy D6Policy H4Policy H2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 746 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed22 October 20266006605
    131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
  2. Allowed16 October 20266005930
    30 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
  3. Allowed24 September 20266005904
    Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
  4. Dismissed24 September 20266005590
    2 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
  5. Notice upheld23 September 20263364241
    First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.