Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 July 20263376843

Pavement o/s 15 Holdenhurst Road,, Bournemouth, BH8 8EH

the installation of 1no. BT Street Hub and removal of associated BT payphones

Authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Pickernell E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: the effect on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on non-designated heritage assets
  • Appeal B: the effect of the proposed advertisements on the visual amenity of the area

What decided it

The significant visual intrusion and incongruous bulk of the street hub in the streetscape, combined with minor harm to the setting of the non-designated heritage asset, outweighed the moderate benefits of digital infrastructure provision.

the moderate benefits of digital infrastructure provision, device charging, improved connectivity, emergency services access, and removal of existing kiosks did not outweigh the significant visual intrusion and harm to character and appearance and the setting of the non-designated heritage asset

Plan policies cited: Policy 5.11 of the Bournemouth District Wide Local Plan (2002), Policy CS7 of the Bournemouth Local Plan: Core Strategy (2012), Policy CS40 of the Bournemouth Local Plan: Core Strategy (2012), Policy CS41 of the Bournemouth Local Plan: Core Strategy (2012), Policy CS8 of the Bournemouth Local Plan: Core Strategy (2012), Policy D3 of the Town Centre Area Action Plan (2013), Policy D4 of the Town Centre Area Action Plan (2013), Policy D7 of the Town Centre Area Action Plan (2013)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.