Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 July 20263377118

Land To The North And South Of The A533 The Hill, Sandbach, CW11 2WE

Planning appeal 3377118 at Land To The North And South Of The A533 The Hill, Sandbach, CW11 2WE (Cheshire East) was allowed on 9 July 2026 by Inspector Parsons J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the location, nature and scale of the proposal would be acceptable in a countryside location having regard to the spatial strategy of the development plan and the character and appearance of the area.

an outline application, with all matters reserved except for access, for development comprising up to 325 residential dwellings (Use Class C3), the creation of a community park located between Manor Road and the A533 The Hill, other open space, landscaping, associated infrastructure, including earthworks and drainage

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Parsons J
Postcode
CW11 2WE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the location, nature and scale of the proposal would be acceptable in a countryside location having regard to the spatial strategy of the development plan and the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the settings of Grade II listed buildings, known as The Hill, Oakley House and Oakley Coach House
  • whether the proposal would minimise ecological impacts and provide net gains for biodiversity, including by establishing coherent networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures and incorporating features which support priority or threatened species
  • whether the proposal would place unreasonable burdens, as an agent of change, on a specialised care home (LCD) for people with physical and learning impairments
  • If there is less than substantial harm caused to a heritage asset, whether this would be outweighed by public benefits
  • If there is a conflict with the development plan, when taken as a whole, whether such conflict is outweighed by other material planning considerations

What decided it

The absence of a five-year housing land supply, engaging the tilted balance, meant the substantial weight attached to housing delivery and affordable housing outweighed the limited/moderate identified harms including the less than substantial heritage harm.

The limited conflict with settlement strategy, moderate harm to character and appearance, less than substantial heritage harm at the lower end of the spectrum, and limited BMVAL loss were outweighed by the substantial and significant benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, accessible homes and other benefits, so permission was granted under the tilted balance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CELPS Policy PG 1CELPS Policy PG 6CELPS PG 7CELPS Policy SE 4SADPD Policy ENV 3SNDP Policy PC2SADPD Policy PG 9SNDP Policies PC3 and H1SADPD Policy ENV 2SADPD Policy ENV 1SADPD Policy ENV 15CELPS Policy SD 2SADPD Policy RUR 5Policy SE 7 of the CELPSHER 1 and HER 4 of the SADPDHC1 of SNDPCELPS Policies EN 1 and EN 2SADPD Policies HOU2 and HOU8SNDP Policy H4Policy SE6 of the CELPSCELPS Policies C02 and C03Policy SC 5 of the CELPSPolicy SC 4 of the CELPS
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 200Paragraph 215Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 58

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

29 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cheshire East

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed27 October 20266004692
    Land Adjoining Jenny Heyes, Heyes Lane, Alderley Edge, SK9 7LH
  2. Allowed5 October 20266008576
    Land At Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Wilmslow, SK9 5LW
  3. Allowed30 September 20266008176
    Sycamore Farm, Well Bank Lane, Over Peover, WA16 8UN
  4. Dismissed22 September 20266007456
    Brookfields Farm, Longhill Lane, Hankelow, CW3 0JQ
  5. Allowed22 September 20266007422
    Brookfields Farm, Longhill Lane, Hankelow, CW3 0JQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.