Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 April 20263377243

Nando's, 37-39 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1LQ

Planning appeal 3377243 at Nando's, 37-39 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1LQ (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 8 April 2026 by Inspector Wallace J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II* listed building 37-41 High Street or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses.

removal of the infill panels at first floor level

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Wallace J
Postcode
KT1 1LQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II* listed building 37-41 High Street or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses

What decided it

The removal of the infill panels would harm the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II* listed building by reducing the legibility of its development phases and diminishing the sense of enclosure, with insufficient public benefits to justify this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan 2021 Policy HC1Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (April 2012) Policy CS8Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (April 2012) Policy DM10Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (April 2012) Policy DM12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

368 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed23 October 20266014767
    13 Hawks Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 3DS
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266005462
    150 Ewell Road, Surbiton, KT6 6HE
  3. Dismissed8 October 20266014049
    69 Sheephouse Way, New Malden, KT3 5PF
  4. Dismissed7 October 20266011912
    11 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
  5. Dismissed6 October 20266009912
    Onslow House First Floor Flat, 1 Crummock Chase, Surbiton, KT6 4NP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.