Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 May 20256000098

54 Ernest Grove, Beckenham, Bromley, BR3 3JF

described on the application form as ‘Single storey rear extension, extending beyond the rear wall of the original house by 5.95m, for which the maximum height would be 3.15m, and for which the height of the eaves would be 2.90m (42 Day Notification for Householder Permitted Development Prior Approval)

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Fish A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development constitutes permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended)

What decided it

The proposed extension would extend beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse and would have a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse, thereby not complying with the permitted development limitations in the GPDO.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.