Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 October 20256000234

22 Malling Way, Hayes, Bromley, BR2 7PJ

to convert existing dwelling into 2 number of Flats

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Sibley G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal upon highway safety
  • the effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of the occupiers of the proposed flats with regard to light and outlook
  • the effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of nearby occupiers with regard to noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal would create unsafe and unsuitable access arrangements by positioning two vehicle crossovers opposite a road junction, requiring vehicles to reverse in and out of driveways, which would significantly harm highway safety and conflict with Policies 9 and 32 of the Bromley Local Plan and Policy T4 of the London Plan.

The modest benefits of contributing one additional dwelling to address the Council's 3.99-year housing land supply shortfall and making effective use of land were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to highway safety, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 115, 116

Plan policies cited: Policy 4 of the Bromley Local Plan, Policy 9 of the Bromley Local Plan, Policy 32 of the Bromley Local Plan, Policy 37 of the Bromley Local Plan, Policy T4 of the London Plan, Policy D3 of the London Plan, Policy D6 of the London Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.